Minos
Operator Intelligence
Minos
Operator Intelligence

Mobile Network Comparison

Independent, public-source comparison of mobile operators across six performance dimensions — coverage, quality, subscriber experience, satisfaction, value, and outage resilience.

31 markets102 operators612+ public sourcesUpdated 3 days ago
Data effective 2026-04-04 · last refresh Jun 1, 2026, 01:47 PM
Subscriber workspace

Turn comparison into ongoing operator intelligence

Create an account and add a payment method to trial Monitoring alerts, Minos Assistant, and Advisor strategy briefs.

Start trialPricingSign in
Market snapshot
United States
3 operators13 sourcesLeader: T-Mobile

T-Mobile leads the current seed because recent Opensignal reporting favors it on reliability, consistency, and speed. Verizon remains strongest on broad coverage depth, while AT&T stays competitive but less differentiated on value and customer sentiment.

How we score
Coverage
Population and geographic reach of 4G/5G networks, including rural and indoor signal quality.
Quality
Download speeds, latency, and network consistency from independent benchmarks.
Subscriber Experience
App performance, streaming quality, and real-world user experience scores.
Sentiment & Satisfaction
Subscriber sentiment from surveys, NPS, social signals, and churn data.
Value
Pricing competitiveness, plan flexibility, and perceived cost-per-GB.
Outage Resilience
Frequency and duration of network disruptions from public outage reports.
✦
Advisor: deeper strategic context
Advisor subscribers get SWOT analysis, prioritised recommended actions, monitoring signals, and cross-market analogues for every operator — powered by Gemini.
Ranking weights

These sliders change how much each dimension contributes to the score.

Operators in comparison view

Select up to four operators for the side-by-side comparison, notes, and sources.

Current weighting impact
Emphasis is currently on Quality and Subscriber Experience. The current ranking order matches the default weighting.
Leader
T-Mobile
83.9
Market average
81.1
Weighted market score
Data confidence
High confidence
83.8/100
Weight emphasis
Quality
Ranking unchanged from default
Overall ranking
Dimension comparison

Side-by-side scores across the six ranking dimensions.

Value vs. experience

X-axis: value score. Y-axis: experience score. Bubble size reflects coverage strength.

Evidence confidence

Confidence reflects the breadth of public evidence available for each operator.

T-Mobile
83.8/100
benchmark, operator, outage
Verizon
83.8/100
benchmark, operator, outage
AT&T
83.8/100
benchmark, operator, outage
Operator ranking table
Rank
Operator
Trend
Overall
Coverage
Quality
Experience
Satisfaction
Value
Outages
1
T-Mobile
—
83.9
88
86
90
82
75
74
2
Verizon
—
81.4
90
84
84
76
70
78
3
AT&T
—
77.9
85
80
79
72
71
76
Operator notes

The selected operators below reflect the current comparison set.

T-Mobile

Strongest: Subscriber Experience

Confidence: High confidence (83.8/100)

  • Seeded as the U.S. leader on overall subscriber experience and consistency.
  • Strong speed profile and favorable social-comment tone keep satisfaction elevated.
  • Coverage breadth remains high but not quite as defensible as Verizon in rural edge cases.

Verizon

Strongest: Coverage

Confidence: High confidence (83.8/100)

  • Strongest coverage score in the U.S. seed, reflecting broad rural and suburban reach.
  • Outage resilience remains solid, but value perception is dragged down by premium pricing.
  • Subscriber sentiment trails T-Mobile when cost is weighted more heavily.

AT&T

Strongest: Coverage

Confidence: High confidence (83.8/100)

  • Balanced position with good national reach and reliable baseline performance.
  • Falls behind on perceived consistency and premium experience metrics in this seed.
  • Still benefits when users prioritize availability over headline speed.
Source transparency

Public references currently used to build the market view and operator summaries.